BUSA

yea nice work considering the balding area is so vast with limited donor. looks like he has plenty of beard donor. is he considering BHT? seems like another 1500 grafts wud serve him well.

talk about tight grafts placement with no shock loss. impressive.

no one is attacking you. if u wanna come up here and give poor advice thats on you but don't expect ppl to go along with it. yes a HAIRLINE is what everyone sees and a high hairline doesn't make anyone look youthful which is the point of a HT. if they don't have donor hair then yes they are restricted to how low their hairline will be. the patient has plenty of donor hair so what makes you think he won't have donor hair to address any future loss? do you perform BHT? thats adds another 3000-5000 grafts on average and some plenty more. 2000 grafts from the beard alone for most ppl if other body hair isn't present. no one has plenty of donor hair if balding in their 20's? what an ignorant statement. plenty of ppl simply start losing their hair early but that doesn't mean they don't have donor hair to address their hairloss when they get older. there has been plenty of patients in their 40. 50 and even 60's that have never had a HT yet started losing their hair when they were in their 20 yet have plenty of donor hair to utilize. I started losing my hair at 21 and I'm now 43. my hairless stabilized 5 years ago and I have over 6000 grafts available to use so stop giving out poor advice! again, started losing hair at 21. I'm a NW5. but according to you its impossible for me to have adequate donor supply cause I started losing hair in my 20's....:rolleyes: and that doesn't include the 10,000+ body hairs I have.

Bosley? lol thats like wanting to build a car to compete in NHRA drag racing and going to Pep Boys to have them build it....:rolleyes: head to Europe if u want it done right for a reasonable price. u can get it done right here in the good ole US of A but ull get ripped off. but even if I had money to burn id still be heading Europe.

a high hairline? why wud anyone want a high hairline? kinda defeats the purpose of a HT when one has plenty of donor hair. let me guess.... you perform FUT not FUE right? lol what makes u think going FUT will result in more grafts for the future? FUE takes what you need and thats it. unlike FUT it does NOT damage surrounding grafts when carving a huge chunk of flesh from the scalp.

looks ok

how many grafts did erdogan recommend vs. the others?

if u look at the majority of results posted these days on this forum they are FUE not FUT. there are still millions of ppl that think Bosely is the best HT center in the world. ignorance is still alive and kicking in the HT world cause no FUE doctors are advertising. strip is not the gold standard. in fact, as more and more time goes by strip will be for very unique cases only. less and less ppl are turning to strip. a low yield from any of the top 10 FUE doctors these days just does not exist unless the patient has unknown medical issues being either the "X" factor or an undisclosed condition. but that wud be true for FUE or FUT. the top 10 FUT doctors can and do still have patients that are left with a bad scar and it has nothing to do with surgeon skill. so the risk of poor yield from top FUE doctors is essentially zero

side effects. I'm sure it wud hav worked great to stop my hairless but strong side effects outweighed any benefit

why doganay over erdogan? both are great imo and u can't go wrong with either just wondering why u chose him? was it price or results or both?

most all of ur top FUE doctors these days have great yield. id say the top 15 FUE doctors have very similar yield success. as far as FUT being able to utilize more grafts I think thats debatable these days.

well put. agree 100%. fin didn't work for me. but, it works for millions of others. there is no reason to think that a medication will suddenly stop working after a few years. unless, its some sort of virus ur treating and the virus is now adapting. hair shafts are not viruses therefore if a medication is stoping or blocking somthn that will cause ur hair to die then it will do the same as long as you take it.

maybe u shud take a long walk off a short pier.......

a HT can look ridiculous too if done by someone who doesn't know wat they r doin? SMP is no different.

wow! dude looks 10 years younger. amazing results. chit, id be happy to have his before hair lol.

check this guy out. almost in the same boat as you as far as hair loss. worked fine for him. yea not apples to apples but certainly not apples to watermelons... http://www.hairrestorationnetwork.com/eve/176881-dr-hakan-doganay-1842-grafts-7-months-ll-update-choi-implanter-pen-fue.html

yea excellent placement and design. totally natural. by 12 months it shud look great.

bhatti just doesn't get it wen it comes to hairlines. I've given up on any hope that he will improve.

can't see much. take some better photos

were still 10 years out before thats a real option. and prob 20-25 yrs here in the states with the way the FDA drags their feet.

you and ur conspiracy theories about marketing tactics and photographic tricks....:rolleyes: give it a rest wud ya. smh

dp....

a 1000 grafts won't make a dent in most pp.'s donor zone. and yes a 1000 or maybe 1500 grafts wud make a huge difference in ur appearance. top HT doctors have great yield. unless ur in ur 40's where ur hairless has pretty much stabilized ull always lose more hair as u age if ur in ur mid 20's now. so what? go back for more as u grow older. thats the beauty of FUE vs. FUT is that u can have multiple surgeries without risking the linear scar getting worse and having to deal with the laxity of ur scalp. u can't continue to go in there and carve huge chunks of flesh from ur scalp without it eventually causing the skin to stretch leaving u with a poorly healed scar requiring FUE to repair it. FUE doesn't come with those issues so a young guy can surely can have a HT if opting for FUE. I wud not recommend FUT at ur age tho. 1000-1500 grafts from another HT doctor won't look the same as it is in the hands of a top HT doctor who's yield is far better.

prob wudnt need more then a 1000 grafts. can't go wrong with either doganay or erdogan but if it was only a 1000 grafts I wud lean towards erodgan but really its a toss up imo. a difference of $2540 for doganay vs. $3040 for erdogan. u shud post up a few more pics of ur donor area. doesn't really look thin but not incredibly dense either but if u hav family members that hav lost most of their hair u will lose more but if ur donor area is sufficient then transplant more as u need them. ull get at least a 1000 grafts from ur beard as well. if u can tolerate the medicines without sexual side effects I wud surely get on some. remember with rogain what u have stopped from falling out will fall out if u don't continue using. it halts the loss for some but rarely grows for any. some do but its rare. the effects of rogain will be reversed if u stop using it. but then again it might not have done chit for you in the first place.

go to Europe. cheaper and better.