Hi Gatsby, you are certainly entitled to your opinion and fortunately my results (and my patients) speak for themselves. It's not my job to convince you otherwise about your predetermined conclusion regarding equipment you have likely never operated with yourself. The world and particularly the field of medicine is very rarely black and white or all good or all bad. These are simply tools and can only be effective when used in the right context (hair type, scalp conditions, individual anatomy, etc.). The Artas admittedly isn't perfect and it's not uncommon that I will start with the Artas and transition to a manual approach, particularly if I need to have more flexibility selecting follicles outside of areas that a grid would be difficult to place. I have been able to acquire very good quality grafts with the Artas when the technology is applied in the appropriate situation with many elated patients. In full transparency I don't use it for site making or implanting because clearly it seems to be inferior in that department. The amount of tissue removed from a 1mm punch is a fraction of the tissue removed from an FUT but yet all the "artist" surgeons you might be alluding to would probably agree that there can be utility of the procedure in the appropriate context. I have not had a substantial difference in recovery/healing/aesthetic result from any Artas patient donor regions compared to manual methods when the technology is used in a conscientious way which tells me your opinion is based more on theoretical opinion and hearsay than from firsthand experience.